|Radiation Information Network's||Radiation Related Frequently Asked Questions|
Question 1: How much is too much radiation?
That is a very good question and not easy to answer. This will depend on the individual, the risk they are taking and the benefit that they will receive from it. As pointed out in the Radiation and Us page, we receive approximately 360 mrem of radiation every year. The legal limit imposed by the federal government in this country for an occupationally exposed worker is 5,000 mrem per year. If we look first at doses received in a short amount of time, (acute doses), the first biological effect begins to be able to be detected by laboratory analysis at 10,000 to 25,000 mrem. Actual immediate life threatening doses are limited to levels of 100,000 mrem and above. The life shortening doses may be lower than that, and are approximated by taking the data at higher doses where the effects are apparent and extrapolating the risk down to lower doses. Being conservative, the regulators use a model of a straight line from high doses down through the zero dose/zero risk point, so that any dose presents some small risk. Also you need to know that doses received over a longer period of time allows for repair of cells by the body, and presents less of a risk. See the Radiation and Risk page for more information. So to answer the question, the doses receive by the workers in nuclear power, an extra 100 to 5,000 mrem per year (average about 500 mrem), are seen by most scientific organizations as presenting a low risk compared to normal occupational hazards encountered during a working lifetime. Children, fetuses and embryos are more sensitive and have a longer expression time than adults, and so have smaller allowable doses. It is really a personal choice how much is too much. In some situations, such as to save someone's life, I personally would accept around 100 rem, but in the normal course of my work, I would rather keep my dose to less than 5 rem per year.
Question 2: Do you have any information about Dr. Luckey's work and where can you get more info on "Hormesis"
Answer question 2:
By hormesis, you mean radiation hormesis. The idea of hormesis goes back to ancient Greece, where it was thought those frequent small doses of a poison would fine-tune the body and cause positive health effects. The same idea has been thought to apply to radiation, such that small amounts of radiation are actually good for humans and that without it, our health actually suffers.
Dr. Luckey is the probably the most famous of the public believers in hormesis, but not the only one. He edited/authored a book for the CRC Press company on Hormesis that is pretty good. The CRC can be reached at:
Other references for Hormesis:
Health Physics, Vol. 52, No. 5, May 1987, is entitled "Special Issue on Radiation Hormesis," and was edited by Leonard Sagan. The table of contents is a bit lengthy, but here are the section headings:
Macklis & Beresford published an article "Radiation Hormesis" in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Vol32, 2, P350, '91 that includes 77 references, that you may find useful.
You can subscribe to the BELLE (Biological Effects of Low Level Exposures) by contacting:
This is an informative publication, covering low level exposure to many toxic agents, including radiation. The December 93 issue has a good article by Leonard Sagan of EPRI on "The Low Dose Effects Paradigm", which considers the pluses and minuses of this approach. It is published quarterly and is quite well done.
There is also a new web site: Hormesis and Radioadaptive Response Page that has information on Hormesis.
Question 3: What is the danger of dental x rays?
Answer questions 3:
The danger would be a slight increase in the risk of cancer. But, from a health standpoint, dental x rays have a much bigger benefit than risk. You will notice though, that your dentist and dental hygienist will not stay in the same room as you, for there is no reason for them to receive doses several times a day, 5 days a week. Their leaving and the lead apron that you may be asked to wear are measures to reduce all of the doses so that they are as low as reasonably achievable.
Question 4: What is the danger of mobile [cellular] phones and can they cause cancer of the face or brain?
Mobile phones radiate and receive electromagnetic radiation in the band of 800 - 900 MHz. This is non-ionizing radiation, but thought by some to have adverse health effects. There is an EMF news letter which has current information on EMF, plus at least two articles on cellular phones including a summary of a new German study that found no correlation with use and cancer. It can be found at the home page for EMF-Link. It would seem that the newest information does not show a link to cancer from the use of mobile phones.
From more information on EMF and other non-ionizing radiation: Information Source Page
Question 5: Why are some isotopes radioactive and others not? Can you predict which ones will be radioactive?
Answer question 5:
There are four fundamental forces in nature. They are the strong nuclear and weak nuclear, electro-magnetic, and gravity forces. These all work with and against each other as the universe tries to gain a stable, low ordered state (lowest energy-most random). Also looking at this question, we need to realize that matter is another form of energy, and that energy is the ability to do work. The center of an atom, the nucleus, is held together (work) by converting a little of the mass of the particles of the nucleus into a binding energy. This is needed to keep all those positively charged protons so close to each other. For light elements, if the number of protons and the number of neutrons are the same, all the forces acting in the nucleus are well matched and the nucleus is stable. But if there are too many neutrons or protons, then the nucleus has too much energy and will normally transfer energy around until the 1:1 neutron to proton ratio is achieved. This frequently is seen as the emission of the energy, or what is called radiation. At higher atomic numbers, there are so many protons, that you need more than 1 neutron per proton to hold the nucleus together. However, there still may be stable configurations for the atoms, and the atoms may try to reach those states by emitting the larger alpha particle. Sometimes, following the initial release of energy, there still may be extra energy in the nucleus, and this can be emitted as a photon, or by transferring the energy to the orbital electrons.
Question 6: What are the different types of radioactive decay?
Answer question 6:
The forms of radioactive decay and other associated processes are as follows:
Other processes related to decay -
Question 7: What are the different types of natural radiation?
Answer question 7:
Natural radiation takes the same forms as "human-caused" radiation. All the same decays discussed above happen naturally. Radiation we are exposed to from our environment include Cosmic (high energy particles and EM from outside of our galaxy), Cosmic induced (C-14, Tritium made in the atmosphere by interactions with cosmic radiation), Solar (UV from the sun mostly, but in space can be particles), and terrestrial (Uranium, Thorium, Radon contained in the Earth itself). Life forms have incorporated all of these into their biomass, so all life on Earth has some amount of radioactivity in it. That includes the food and water we ingest, and humans in general.
For more info:
Question 8: What methods are used to detect radiation?
Answer question 8:
Because ionizing radiation does just that, ionizes, it is easy to see that using a medium like a gas, and a voltage, you can measure the amount of charge liberated in that medium. That is the most common method of measuring radiation. The infamous Geiger Counter is in reality a small volume of gas, with a voltage applied across it. As the radiation enters the gas, it causes electrons to be formed, which are collected and measured to determine the amount of initial radiation present. Another common detection device uses a process similar to the Glow-In-The-Dark plastics, paints, and watches that can be found in every store. While a little more complicated than that, the processes used with radiation detection is called scintillation. Scintillation is the giving off of visible light after interaction with radiation. The light can be collected then and used as another measure of the radiation intensity and energy. But, there are many different ways of measuring radiation, using semiconductors, liquids, superheated bubbles, crystals and plastics.
See these pages for more on measuring radiation:
Question 9: What are some examples of applications of constructive uses of radioactive isotopes?
Answer question 9:
The applications of radiation are numerous. I have listed some below:
Here's just a sampling of radioactive materials...and the many ways they improve lives.
Question 10: What are the biological effects of exposure to radiation?
Answer question 10:
The effect depends on the amount (dose), ranging from no effect (low) to death (high). For the most part, what radiation does is create ions in our cells, and these ions cause problems in the cell. damage may lead to cancer.
The radiation may interact directly with biologically significant molecules, like DNA and proteins. Radiation may also interact indirectly to cause damage, by interacting with chemicals in our bodies, such as water, and form very active chemicals like free radicals that may cause damage to the biologically significant molecules. The damage can be fixed, or the cell may die, or it may actually affect the tissue/organ if there is enough damage. It is felt that the damage to the DNA is of the most importance, and could lead to increase risk of cancer. The damage could be to a single base pair, could cause the DNA to bind to itself or cause an actually break the DNA on one stand or more rarely, to both DNA strands. If the damage is not fixed or is fixed wrong and the cell escapes apoptosis (programmed cell death) it may be one of the several needed steps that results in the cell becoming a tumor. But the chain of events that leads from DNA damage to cancer is a long, multi-step process with many check points along the way where things must go wrong in order to cause cancer.
One of the reasons cancer is not more common is that every minute of the day for your whole life, your body's repair mechanisms are working to fix damage to your DNA. It is surprising how many times each hour, each cell's DNA is damaged:
Rates of DNA Damage in a Mammalian Cell
Nevertheless, our repair mechanisms fix almost all of these damages at very high rates and efficiencies:
Maximum DNA repair Rates in a Human Cell
Source is a text book called "Human Heredity" by Michael R Cummings (3rd ed.), West Publishing Company, St. Paul 1994. Chapter 12: Mutagens, Carcinogesn and Teratogens, Page 337.
If the damage were in the sex cells, there would be some risk of a DNA change (a mutation) being passed on to the next generation. The physical effects of these radiation-induced mutations have never been seen in humans though. Humans have about a one in ten chance of passing along a natural (non-radiation induced) mutation to their offspring. This natural rate normally is of little consequence, either being recessive or not health threatening, but some do cause significant health problems. Many studies have looked for the physical manifestations of the radiation damage in the children, grand children and great grandchildren of the Atomic Bomb survivors, and have not shown an increase above this natural rate.
For more information, try:
Question 11: How do microwaves heat things?
Microwaves are electromagnetic radiation and part of the Electromagnetic Spectrum, along with radio waves, infrared, light, ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays. Microwaves do not have enough energy to remove electrons from the orbits of atoms, putting it in the class of non-ionizing radiation. Electromagnetic radiation is energy in transfer by electromagnetic waves. These waves move at the speed of light. Microwaves have a range of frequencies of 0.03 to 300 GHz, placing it between Radio-frequency and Infrared radiation in the Electromagnetic Spectrum. Hertz (Hz) is a measure of frequency, the number of times per second that the waves oscillate, in the electric and the magnetic directions. (Note: "GHz" means a billion hertz, or a billion of times per second ). Microwave ovens often use 0.9 or 2.5 GHz for their heating frequencies.
The way microwaves heat things, according to Professor Herman Cember in his book Introduction to Health Physics (Pergamon Press):
In its interaction with matter, microwave energy may either be reflected, as in case of metals, it may be transmitted with little energy loss to the transmitting medium, as in the case of glass, or it may be absorbed by irradiated matter, and thus raise the temperature of the absorber. This heating is attributed to two effects: the main mechanism is believed to be joule heating due to ionic currents induced by the electric fields that are set up within the absorbing medium by the radiation. The second mechanism is due to the interaction between polar molecules in the absorber and the applied high-frequency electric field. The alternating electric field causes these polar molecules to oscillate back and forth in an attempt to maintain the proper alignment in the electric field. These oscillations are resisted by other intermolecular forces, and work done by the alternating electric field in overcoming these resistive forces is converted into heat.
In other words, the EM waves oscillate at high frequency, and set up currents and move molecules. The moving molecules and current generate heat. It has nothing to do with excitation.
Water is a polar molecule and has good heat transfer, so it is a good microwave-able material. Many biological molecules are also polar. The microwaves penetrate most materials to a depth of 1-2 cm. The heat is then transferred by conduction to the whole of the material.
For more information on Microwaves, see our Non-ionizing information webpage
Question 12: What is radiation sickness?
That is a good question. Radiation sickness is not generally well understood by the public, yet there term is commonly used, or I should say, mis-used in Hollywood films and the written media.
When talking about radiation and its effects, we measure the amount received using a unit system called dose (radiation dose), with the unit called rem. As an example, from natural radiation sources, we receive roughly 0.200 - 0.300 rem per year, (or 200 - 300 mrem) depending on where you live. The other important factor in radiation effects is time. As you can imagine, receiving a dose of 100 rem in a minute is worse than receiving it over 100 years. Let me explain a little about what radiation does to help explain that.
What radiation does is cause atoms to loose electrons, being ionized. if this happens in a body, these ions can do damage in cells. If only a little damage happens, like from natural background, being a low dose over a long period of time, the body repairs the damage done. However, as you increase the dose and short the time it is received, the cells in your body can not repair all the damage. At that time, they will have a good chance of dying. Even this is not a big deal, we have trillion of cells in our body, and millions die every day. But if the dose is very large over a short period of time (acute), enough sensitive cells can be killed that it will effect the well being of the body.
This is what radiation sickness is. The some of the most sensitive cells in a human are the active cells in the lining of the intestine (called crypt cells), white blood cells, and the cells that make red and white blood cells. With enough damage done to your intestine lining, you will feel sick, maybe vomit, have nausea, not be able to absorb water, become dehydrated, etc. This is what is typically called radiation sickness, the nausea, vomiting, overall sick feeling from a high dose of radiation.
Returning to dose, to get this type of sickness, you have to receive a radiation dose in the range of 100-250 rem, in a short period, say in a day or less. The cases of radiation sickness that we do see are normally in this range, over a few minutes. In accidents, you have to have something very big to cause this high of dose. Some of the people who died at Chernobyl received this high of dose. It is rare outside of major accidents and radiation cancer therapy, most occupational doses for radiation workers are well below 1 rem per year. It is rare for anyone to get above 5 rem per year (the legal limit for dose for workers in the US). We have some good info on this at: http://www.physics.isu.edu/radinf/ look under General section.
Here is another web page with information on acute effects RadEFX(sm) Ionizing Radiation Health Effects Forum
Question 13: What type of radiation is likely to be emitted from optical glass as used in (older) cameras, i.e. gamma or beta, for instance?
The radiation is from elements added to improve resolution. The main contributor is usually thorium. Thorium isotopes primarily emit both alpha and beta radiation. What you are primarily seeing with your instrument is the beta radiation. Your paper shield test is a great way to distinguish between beta and alpha radiation. Most betas will go through the paper while most alphas will not. The reason that it is directional is that the metal casing on the lens shields the betas along with the alphas.
As for the hazard from these, my answer, as a health physicist and fellow camera collector, is do not worry about it. With that said, you need to realize that you receive between 300 and 400 millirems of radiation every year from background sources. (I live in Colorado, so my annual dose is higher due to the higher elevation here.) Unless you carry one of these lenses around with you, with the glass in direct contact with your skin, you will not receive any measurable dose from these. I would guess that your annual dose from normal handling of these is less than one millirem.
As an aside, there are some lenses out there, from military applications, that have a significantly higher concentration of thorium than "civilian" cameras, and thus have more radiation coming from them.
Question 14: How is radioactivity taken into the body?
Radioactivity is taken into the body in three ways:
This is called "Internal Exposure". Internal Exposure can be prevented by taking precautions such as wearing gloves and lab coats, not eating, drinking or smoking when working with radioactive material, using a hood for volatile compounds, etc. Internal Exposure is usually through "Unsealed sources" of radiation, such as liquids, powders, etc.
One can also get an "External Exposure" even if the source is outside the body. This is true of gamma emitters and X-rays, etc.
See our Radioactivity in Nature page for the amounts of natural radioactive materials taken into the body.
Question 15: What radiation dangers are there in television viewing. What type of levels of radiation have been measured from tvs?
There is no danger from radiation from viewing a TV. The dose to a person in the US from watching TV for a year is less than 1 mrem. 1 mrem is about 1/10 of the dose from a chest x-ray, or about the same amount you get in 1 day from natural radiation you are exposed to.
TVs work by accelerating electrons using a high voltage source, and aiming them at the screen. The screen is made up of a material, called a phosphor that emits light when struck by the electron. (electrons are the negative particle that orbits around all atoms). One by-product of the electron interactions are x-rays.
Prior to 1970, several studies were done to measure the radiation levels given off by televisions, color ones where known to have some x-rays given off. In the study, about 6% of them were above the recommended standard of 0.5 mrem/hr. Today's TV use new screens and lower voltage, and so the amount of radiation (given off as x-rays) is not detectable above background radiation unless you are using a very sensitive x-ray counting equipment.
Question 16: What about pregnancy and radiation?
Risk from radiation is related to how much one receives, called radiation dose or just dose. It has to be kept in mind that pregnant women and her fetus IS receiving radiation dose all the time, from natural sources. (see natural radioactivity) Therefore, what we are really talking about is an increase in the dose, above background levels. It is not a matter of presence of radiation dose, but one of magnitude.
A small increase in the dose has an insignificant increase in risk. In the US, a conservative limit is placed on pregnant workers, to keep the dose to a fetus less than 500 mrem and keep the dose uniform through out the pregnancy. This allows workers the opportunity to continue to work in their assigned jobs, and provides a safe environment for the fetus. As long as the doses are kept at this level or less, the fetus has very little risk from the radiation. When compared to other risks, it is insignificant. See the links below for more information on the risks.
More FAQ on Radiation and Nuclear Power
For more info:
Comments, corrections or ideas can be sent to theWebmaster.